India

DRM Addresses Safety Concerns at Chirakkal Gate After Accident Reports

The Divisional Railway Manager (DRM) of Palakkad clarified that there were no safety lapses at the Chirakkal railway gate following reports of a narrowly averted accident. The Mangaluru-Chennai Mail train halted at a red signal before the gate, and the system functioned as intended. The DRM emphasized that all gates in the Palakkad division are interlocked, ensuring passenger safety. Disciplinary action has been initiated against the gatekeeper for dereliction of duty, with ongoing safety drives in place.

MBN India Reporter

MBN India Reporter

Jun 21, 2026

4 views
DRM Addresses Safety Concerns at Chirakkal Gate After Accident Reports

Key Takeaways

  • DRM confirms no safety lapses at Chirakkal gate
  • Train stopped at red signal, preventing accident
  • Disciplinary action against gatekeeper initiated

This Chirakkal railway gate news created lot of panic first,because reports made it sound like Mangaluru-Chennai Mail (Train No. 12602) almost met with accident due to gatekeeper negligence . But now Divisional Railway Manager ( DRM ) of Palakkad division,Madhukar Roat,is saying there were no safety lapses.

And honestly,this kind of clarification matters because railway gate stories scare people instantly . One small mistake near level crossing can become very big issue,so public reaction is understandable.

As per Madhukar Roat,train had actually stopped at red signal before moving ahead . That means system did what it was supposed to do . Train halted at level-crossing signal because gate was not cleared for passage .

Reports had also claimed gatekeeper Rajesh Kavalan was under influence of alcohol . But DRM dismissed that part and said train did not move until gate was securely closed . So according to railway side,there was no unsafe situation for road users.

Few things standing out clearly here:

  • Mangaluru-Chennai Mail (Train No. 12602) stopped at red signal before gate .
  • All 122 level crossing gates in Palakkad division have interlocking mechanisms .
  • Disciplinary actions initiated against Rajesh Kavalan for dereliction of duty .

And this interlocking part is actually main point . If gates are open,train cannot simply pass through,as per system design . So even if some confusion happened on ground,technical safety layer seems to have prevented bigger trouble .

But at same time,dereliction of duty is not small thing ah . Railway gates are not casual job posts where one delay or one careless moment can be ignored . If disciplinary actions are initiated,then clearly department also sees some lapse in conduct,even if accident risk was controlled by system .

Madhukar Roat also said regular safety drives are conducted in division,and counselling sessions are being given to staff at level crossings and stations . Fair enough,but public will still ask same basic question: if system worked,why did this scare happen in first place?

For now,Indian Railways is saying safety systems worked properly and there was no danger to road users . Maybe technically that is true . But when gatekeeper issue,red signal and near-accident reports all come together,people will still feel uneasy only…

Source: thehindu-top
#Palakkad#Chirakkal railway gate#safety measures#Indian Railways#Madhukar Roat#railway safety#Mangaluru-Chennai Mail#gatekeeper#interlocking system#accident prevention

Related Articles